Search for Indicators
Disparities Dashboard
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
Health / Prevention & Safety
Health / Prevention & Safety
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
Value
Compared to:
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Allen
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Allen
60.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(59.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(57.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: DeKalb
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: DeKalb
58.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(59.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Huntington
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Huntington
54.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(59.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(43.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Kosciusko
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Kosciusko
49.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(59.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(52.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Noble
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Noble
54.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(59.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(56.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Wabash
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Wabash
58.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(59.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(60.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Wells
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Wells
60.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(59.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Adams
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Adams
48.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(55.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(52.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Allen
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Allen
52.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(55.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: DeKalb
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: DeKalb
66.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(55.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(70.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Huntington
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Huntington
70.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(55.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(72.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Kosciusko
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Kosciusko
54.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(55.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(54.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: LaGrange
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: LaGrange
42.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(55.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(47.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Noble
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Noble
57.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(55.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Wabash
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Wabash
67.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(55.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(69.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Wells
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Wells
44.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(55.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(38.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Whitley
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Whitley
51.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(55.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(52.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Adams
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Adams
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Allen
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Allen
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Asthma: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Huntington
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Asthma: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Noble
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Noble
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Wabash
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Wells
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Wells
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Whitley
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
COPD: Medicare Population County: Adams
COPD: Medicare Population County: Adams
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
COPD: Medicare Population County: Allen
COPD: Medicare Population County: Allen
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
COPD: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
COPD: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
COPD: Medicare Population County: Huntington
COPD: Medicare Population County: Huntington
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
COPD: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
COPD: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
COPD: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
COPD: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
COPD: Medicare Population County: Noble
COPD: Medicare Population County: Noble
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
COPD: Medicare Population County: Wabash
COPD: Medicare Population County: Wabash
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
COPD: Medicare Population County: Wells
COPD: Medicare Population County: Wells
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
COPD: Medicare Population County: Whitley
COPD: Medicare Population County: Whitley
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Adams
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Adams
183.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(495.2)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(183.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Allen
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Allen
583.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(495.2)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(582.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: DeKalb
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: DeKalb
251.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(495.2)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(339.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Huntington
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Huntington
219.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(495.2)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(258.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Kosciusko
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Kosciusko
258.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(495.2)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(332.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: LaGrange
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: LaGrange
115.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(495.2)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(130.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Noble
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Noble
299.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(495.2)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(364.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Wabash
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Wabash
272.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(495.2)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(227.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Wells
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Wells
211.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(495.2)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(191.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Whitley
Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Whitley
248.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(495.2)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(229.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Adams
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Adams
38.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(181.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(47.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Allen
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Allen
197.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(181.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(225.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: DeKalb
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: DeKalb
75.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(181.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(96.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Huntington
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Huntington
57.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(181.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(73.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Kosciusko
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Kosciusko
58.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(181.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(107.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: LaGrange
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: LaGrange
29.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(181.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Noble
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Noble
59.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(181.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(133.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Wabash
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Wabash
51.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(181.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(45.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Wells
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Wells
24.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(181.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Whitley
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Whitley
43.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(181.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(55.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Adams
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Adams
28.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(223.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Allen
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Allen
193.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(223.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(189.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HIV Prevalence Rate County: DeKalb
HIV Prevalence Rate County: DeKalb
57.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(223.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(64.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Huntington
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Huntington
89.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(223.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(99.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Kosciusko
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Kosciusko
56.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(223.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(56.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HIV Prevalence Rate County: LaGrange
HIV Prevalence Rate County: LaGrange
53.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(223.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(44.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Noble
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Noble
66.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(223.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(56.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Wabash
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Wabash
49.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(223.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(45.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Wells
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Wells
55.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(223.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(60.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Whitley
HIV Prevalence Rate County: Whitley
75.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(223.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Weight Status
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Adams
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Adams
32.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Allen
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Allen
36.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(36.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: DeKalb
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: DeKalb
29.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(31.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Huntington
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Huntington
32.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(32.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Kosciusko
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Kosciusko
33.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(32.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: LaGrange
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: LaGrange
23.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(28.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Noble
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Noble
35.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(31.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Wabash
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Wabash
33.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(33.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Wells
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Wells
27.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(25.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Whitley
Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Whitley
28.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(28.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities
Value
Compared to:
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Adams
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Adams
31
Adults
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(34)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Allen
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Allen
583
Adults
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(620)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: DeKalb
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: DeKalb
71
Adults
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(38)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Huntington
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Huntington
141
Adults
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(69)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Kosciusko
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Kosciusko
58
Adults
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(57)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: LaGrange
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: LaGrange
26
Adults
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(32)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Noble
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Noble
113
Adults
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(72)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Wabash
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Wabash
80
Adults
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(65)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Wells
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Wells
60
Adults
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(47)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Whitley
Adults Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Whitley
34
Adults
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(33)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide County: Allen
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide County: Allen
10.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(8.1)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Average Daily Jail Population County: Adams
Average Daily Jail Population County: Adams
4
Offenders
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Average Daily Jail Population County: Allen
Average Daily Jail Population County: Allen
33
Offenders
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(43)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Average Daily Jail Population County: DeKalb
Average Daily Jail Population County: DeKalb
4
Offenders
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Average Daily Jail Population County: Huntington
Average Daily Jail Population County: Huntington
7
Offenders
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Average Daily Jail Population County: Kosciusko
Average Daily Jail Population County: Kosciusko
7
Offenders
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Average Daily Jail Population County: LaGrange
Average Daily Jail Population County: LaGrange
3
Offenders
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Average Daily Jail Population County: Noble
Average Daily Jail Population County: Noble
7
Offenders
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Average Daily Jail Population County: Wabash
Average Daily Jail Population County: Wabash
4
Offenders
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Average Daily Jail Population County: Wells
Average Daily Jail Population County: Wells
5
Offenders
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Average Daily Jail Population County: Whitley
Average Daily Jail Population County: Whitley
3
Offenders
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities
Value
Compared to:
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Adams
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Adams
2
Juveniles
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Allen
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Allen
24
Juveniles
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(27)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: DeKalb
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: DeKalb
2
Juveniles
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Huntington
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Huntington
0
Juveniles
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Kosciusko
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Kosciusko
4
Juveniles
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: LaGrange
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: LaGrange
2
Juveniles
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Noble
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Noble
11
Juveniles
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Wabash
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Wabash
1
Juveniles
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Wells
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Wells
4
Juveniles
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Whitley
Juveniles Admitted into Correctional Facilities County: Whitley
1
Juveniles
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Demographics
Foreign Born Persons County: Allen
Foreign Born Persons County: Allen
7.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Foreign Born Persons Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
Foreign Born Persons Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
8.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Allen, IN County Value
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Allen County value.
IN Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Population County: Adams
Total Population County: Adams
36,288
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(36,151)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Population County: Allen
Total Population County: Allen
394,545
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(391,644)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Population County: DeKalb
Total Population County: DeKalb
44,198
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(43,813)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Population County: Huntington
Total Population County: Huntington
36,781
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(36,800)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Population County: Kosciusko
Total Population County: Kosciusko
80,364
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(80,564)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Population County: LaGrange
Total Population County: LaGrange
40,907
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(40,854)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Population County: Noble
Total Population County: Noble
47,430
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(47,234)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Population County: Wabash
Total Population County: Wabash
30,670
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(30,842)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Population County: Wells
Total Population County: Wells
28,555
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(28,298)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Population County: Whitley
Total Population County: Whitley
34,742
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(34,577)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population County: Adams
Veteran Population County: Adams
5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population County: Allen
Veteran Population County: Allen
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population County: DeKalb
Veteran Population County: DeKalb
6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population County: Huntington
Veteran Population County: Huntington
8.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population County: Kosciusko
Veteran Population County: Kosciusko
7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population County: LaGrange
Veteran Population County: LaGrange
3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population County: Noble
Veteran Population County: Noble
7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population County: Wabash
Veteran Population County: Wabash
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population County: Wells
Veteran Population County: Wells
6.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population County: Whitley
Veteran Population County: Whitley
7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
Veteran Population Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Allen, IN County Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Allen County value.
IN Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46508
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46508
1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46510
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46510
9.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46524
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46524
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46538
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46538
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46539
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46539
3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46542
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46542
8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46555
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46555
9.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46562
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46562
11.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46565
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46565
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the LaGrange County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46567
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46567
7.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46571
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46571
2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the LaGrange County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46580
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46580
6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46582
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46582
6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46590
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46590
3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46701
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46701
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Noble, IN County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Noble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46702
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46702
4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Huntington, IN County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Huntington County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46704
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46704
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Allen, IN County Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Allen County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46705
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46705
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
DeKalb, IN County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the DeKalb County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46706
Veteran Population Zip Code: 46706
6.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
DeKalb, IN County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the DeKalb County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
