Search for Indicators
Disparities Dashboard
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
Health / Disabilities
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: Kosciusko
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: Kosciusko
6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: LaGrange
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: LaGrange
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: Noble
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: Noble
7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: Wabash
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: Wabash
7.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: Wells
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: Wells
5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: Whitley
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: Whitley
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
7.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Allen, IN County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Allen County value.
IN Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Adams
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Adams
86.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(85.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Allen
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Allen
90.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(88.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: DeKalb
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: DeKalb
91.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(90.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Huntington
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Huntington
92.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(90.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Kosciusko
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Kosciusko
88.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(87.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: LaGrange
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: LaGrange
71.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(75.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Noble
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Noble
88.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(86.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Wabash
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Wabash
90.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(90.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Wells
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Wells
92.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(90.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Whitley
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Whitley
92.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(91.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with Health Insurance County: Adams
Persons with Health Insurance County: Adams
86.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(87.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Allen
Persons with Health Insurance County: Allen
91.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(90.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: DeKalb
Persons with Health Insurance County: DeKalb
92.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(91.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Huntington
Persons with Health Insurance County: Huntington
93.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(91.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Kosciusko
Persons with Health Insurance County: Kosciusko
90.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(88.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: LaGrange
Persons with Health Insurance County: LaGrange
66.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(75.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Noble
Persons with Health Insurance County: Noble
89.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(87.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Wabash
Persons with Health Insurance County: Wabash
91.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(91.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Wells
Persons with Health Insurance County: Wells
93.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(92.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Whitley
Persons with Health Insurance County: Whitley
93.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(92.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Private Health Insurance Only County: Allen
Persons with Private Health Insurance Only County: Allen
58.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(56.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(54.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with Private Health Insurance Only County: Kosciusko
Persons with Private Health Insurance Only County: Kosciusko
53.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(56.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(53.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with Private Health Insurance Only Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
Persons with Private Health Insurance Only Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
52.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Allen, IN County Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Allen County value.
IN Value
(56.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Allen
Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Allen
25.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(25.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Kosciusko
Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Kosciusko
27.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(22.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with Public Health Insurance Only Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
Persons with Public Health Insurance Only Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
29.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Allen, IN County Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Allen County value.
IN Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Adams
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Adams
2,327
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(3,099)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,455)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Allen
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Allen
3,143
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(3,099)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,999)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
2,981
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(3,099)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,507)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Huntington
2,776
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(3,099)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,948)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
3,528
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(3,099)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3,384)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
2,055
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(3,099)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,652)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Noble
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Noble
3,251
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(3,099)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3,018)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Wabash
2,205
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(3,099)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,930)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Wells
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Wells
3,354
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(3,099)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3,247)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Whitley
2,685
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(3,099)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,730)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Information Technology
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Adams
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Adams
69.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Allen
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Allen
92.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: DeKalb
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: DeKalb
86.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Huntington
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Huntington
88.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Kosciusko
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Kosciusko
87.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: LaGrange
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: LaGrange
58.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Noble
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Noble
85.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Wabash
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Wabash
88.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Wells
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Wells
88.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Whitley
Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Whitley
89.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Internet Subscription Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
Persons with an Internet Subscription Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
92.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Allen, IN County Value
(92.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Allen County value.
IN Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 18085961000
Persons with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 18085961000
81.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,505 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,221 U.S. census tracts.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(83.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Persons with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 18085962100
Persons with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 18085962100
88.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,505 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,221 U.S. census tracts.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(83.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kosciusko County value.
Persons with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 18087970300
Persons with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 18087970300
35.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,505 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,221 U.S. census tracts.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(52.4%)
The regional value is compared to the LaGrange County value.
Persons with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 18183050400
Persons with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 18183050400
90.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,505 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,221 U.S. census tracts.
Whitley, IN County Value
(85.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Whitley County value.
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
Value
Compared to:
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Adams
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Adams
37.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(40.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Allen
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Allen
42.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(40.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(41.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: DeKalb
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: DeKalb
45.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(40.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(46.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Huntington
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Huntington
56.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(40.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Kosciusko
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Kosciusko
34.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(40.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(35.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: LaGrange
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: LaGrange
54.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(40.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Noble
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Noble
46.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(40.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(44.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Wabash
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Wabash
57.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(40.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(54.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Wells
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Wells
50.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(40.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(46.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Whitley
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Whitley
45.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(40.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(47.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease
Value
Compared to:
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Adams
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Adams
82.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(95.8)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(83.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Allen
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Allen
85.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(95.8)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(82.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: DeKalb
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: DeKalb
97.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(95.8)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(106.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Huntington
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Huntington
95.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(95.8)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(101.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Kosciusko
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Kosciusko
87.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(95.8)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(91.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: LaGrange
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: LaGrange
81.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(95.8)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(88.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Noble
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Noble
118.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(95.8)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(116.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Wabash
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Wabash
76.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(95.8)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(93.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Wells
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Wells
114.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(95.8)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(108.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Whitley
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Whitley
83.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(95.8)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(85.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Adams
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Adams
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Allen
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Allen
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Huntington
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Noble
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Noble
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Wabash
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Wells
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Wells
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Whitley
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Adams
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Adams
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Allen
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Allen
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Huntington
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Noble
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Noble
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Wabash
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Wells
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Wells
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Whitley
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Adams
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Adams
66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Allen
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Allen
64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
60.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(58.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Huntington
66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(64.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(64.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
58.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(56.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Noble
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Noble
59.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Wabash
67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Wells
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Wells
72.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Whitley
63.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(60.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Adams
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Adams
70.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(69.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Allen
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Allen
67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Huntington
71.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(70.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(67.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
63.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Noble
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Noble
66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(65.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Wabash
71.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(69.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Wells
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Wells
73.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(72.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Whitley
67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(65.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Adams
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Adams
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Allen
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Allen
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Huntington
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Noble
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Noble
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Wabash
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Wells
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Wells
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Whitley
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Adams
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Adams
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Allen
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Allen
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Stroke: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Stroke: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Huntington
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Stroke: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Stroke: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Noble
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Noble
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Wabash
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Wells
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Wells
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Whitley
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
Value
Compared to:
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia County: Allen
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia County: Allen
11.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(12.7)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Adams
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Adams
43.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(43.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Allen
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Allen
56.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(54.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Huntington
51.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Noble
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Noble
51.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Wabash
43.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(52.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Wells
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Wells
51.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Whitley
53.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(52.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
Value
Compared to:
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Adams
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Adams
34.6%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(34.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
