Search for Indicators

Disparities Dashboard

Turn Colorblind Mode On See the Legend

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Overcrowded Households

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Overcrowded Households

Value
Compared to:

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Albion

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Albion

8.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Albion has a value of 8.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), Albion has a value of 8.7% which is higher and worse.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Albion has a value of 8.7% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Albion has a value of 8.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Altona

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Altona

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Altona has a value of 0.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), Altona has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Altona has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Altona has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Andrews

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Andrews

5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Andrews has a value of 5.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Huntington, IN County Value (1.4%), Andrews has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
Huntington, IN County Value
(1.4%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Andrews has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Andrews has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Ashley

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Ashley

1.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Ashley has a value of 1.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), Ashley has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Ashley has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Ashley has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Auburn

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Auburn

2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Auburn has a value of 2.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), Auburn has a value of 2.3% which is higher and worse.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Auburn has a value of 2.3% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Auburn has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Avilla

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Avilla

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Avilla has a value of 1.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), Avilla has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Avilla has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Avilla has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Berne

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Berne

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Berne has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Adams, IN County Value (3.6%), Berne has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Adams, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Berne has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Berne has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Bluffton

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Bluffton

1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Bluffton has a value of 1.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), Bluffton has a value of 1.0% which is higher and worse.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Bluffton has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Bluffton has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Burket

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Burket

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Burket has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Burket has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Burket has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Burket has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Butler

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Butler

5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Butler has a value of 5.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), Butler has a value of 5.3% which is higher and worse.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Butler has a value of 5.3% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Butler has a value of 5.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Churubusco

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Churubusco

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Churubusco has a value of 0.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Whitley, IN County Value (1.0%), Churubusco has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
Whitley, IN County Value
(1.0%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Churubusco has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Churubusco has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Claypool

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Claypool

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Claypool has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Claypool has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Claypool has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Claypool has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Columbia City

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Columbia City

1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Columbia City has a value of 1.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Whitley, IN County Value (1.0%), Columbia City has a value of 1.7% which is higher and worse.
Whitley, IN County Value
(1.0%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Columbia City has a value of 1.7%.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Columbia City has a value of 1.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Corunna

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corunna

5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Corunna has a value of 5.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), Corunna has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Corunna has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Corunna has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Cromwell

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Cromwell

6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Cromwell has a value of 6.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), Cromwell has a value of 6.6% which is higher and worse.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Cromwell has a value of 6.6% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Cromwell has a value of 6.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Decatur

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Decatur

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Decatur has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Adams, IN County Value (3.6%), Decatur has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Adams, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Decatur has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Decatur has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3% in 2016-2020)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Etna Green

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Etna Green

0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Etna Green has a value of 0.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Etna Green has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Etna Green has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Etna Green has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Fort Wayne

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Fort Wayne

1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Fort Wayne has a value of 1.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), Fort Wayne has a value of 1.8%.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Fort Wayne has a value of 1.8% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Fort Wayne has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Garrett

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Garrett

0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Garrett has a value of 0.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), Garrett has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Garrett has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Garrett has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3% in 2016-2020)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Geneva

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Geneva

2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Geneva has a value of 2.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Adams, IN County Value (3.6%), Geneva has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
Adams, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Geneva has a value of 2.2% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Geneva has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Grabill

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Grabill

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Grabill has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), Grabill has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Grabill has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Grabill has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Hamilton

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Hamilton

0.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Hamilton has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), Hamilton has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Hamilton has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Hamilton has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Harlan

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Harlan

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Harlan has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), Harlan has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Harlan has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Harlan has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Hoagland

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Hoagland

2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Hoagland has a value of 2.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), Hoagland has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Hoagland has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Hoagland has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Howe

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Howe

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Howe has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the LaGrange, IN County Value (3.6%), Howe has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Howe has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Howe has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3% in 2016-2020)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Huntertown

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Huntertown

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Huntertown has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), Huntertown has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Huntertown has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Huntertown has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Huntington

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Huntington

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Huntington has a value of 1.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Huntington, IN County Value (1.4%), Huntington has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
Huntington, IN County Value
(1.4%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Huntington has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Huntington has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Kendallville

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Kendallville

1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Kendallville has a value of 1.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), Kendallville has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Kendallville has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Kendallville has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Kimmell

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Kimmell

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Kimmell has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), Kimmell has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Kimmell has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Kimmell has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): La Fontaine

Current Value:

Census Place (City): La Fontaine

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, La Fontaine has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Wabash, IN County Value (1.2%), La Fontaine has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wabash, IN County Value
(1.2%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), La Fontaine has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), La Fontaine has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Lagrange

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Lagrange

3.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Lagrange has a value of 3.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the LaGrange, IN County Value (3.6%), Lagrange has a value of 3.2% which is lower and better.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Lagrange has a value of 3.2% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Lagrange has a value of 3.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Lagro

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Lagro

2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Lagro has a value of 2.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Wabash, IN County Value (1.2%), Lagro has a value of 2.3% which is higher and worse.
Wabash, IN County Value
(1.2%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Lagro has a value of 2.3% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Lagro has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Laketon

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Laketon

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Laketon has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Wabash, IN County Value (1.2%), Laketon has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wabash, IN County Value
(1.2%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Laketon has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Laketon has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Larwill

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Larwill

1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Larwill has a value of 1.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Whitley, IN County Value (1.0%), Larwill has a value of 1.8% which is higher and worse.
Whitley, IN County Value
(1.0%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Larwill has a value of 1.8% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Larwill has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Leesburg

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Leesburg

8.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Leesburg has a value of 8.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Leesburg has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Leesburg has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Leesburg has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Leo-Cedarville

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Leo-Cedarville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Leo-Cedarville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), Leo-Cedarville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Leo-Cedarville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Leo-Cedarville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Ligonier

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Ligonier

2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Ligonier has a value of 2.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), Ligonier has a value of 2.6%.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Ligonier has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Ligonier has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Markle

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Markle

1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Markle has a value of 1.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Huntington, IN County Value (1.4%), Markle has a value of 1.5% which is higher and worse.
Huntington, IN County Value
(1.4%)
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), Markle has a value of 1.5% which is higher and worse.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Markle has a value of 1.5% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Markle has a value of 1.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Mentone

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Mentone

0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Mentone has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Mentone has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Mentone has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Mentone has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Milford

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Milford

1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Milford has a value of 1.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Milford has a value of 1.3% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Milford has a value of 1.3% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Milford has a value of 1.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Monroe

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Monroe

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Monroe has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Adams, IN County Value (3.6%), Monroe has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Adams, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Monroe has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Monroe has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3% in 2016-2020)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Monroeville

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Monroeville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Monroeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), Monroeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Monroeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Monroeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Mount Etna

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Mount Etna

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Mount Etna has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Huntington, IN County Value (1.4%), Mount Etna has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Huntington, IN County Value
(1.4%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Mount Etna has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Mount Etna has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Nappanee

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Nappanee

1.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Nappanee has a value of 1.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Nappanee has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Nappanee has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Nappanee has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3% in 2016-2020)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): New Haven

Current Value:

Census Place (City): New Haven

1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, New Haven has a value of 1.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), New Haven has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), New Haven has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), New Haven has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): North Manchester

Current Value:

Census Place (City): North Manchester

0.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, North Manchester has a value of 0.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Wabash, IN County Value (1.2%), North Manchester has a value of 0.8% which is lower and better.
Wabash, IN County Value
(1.2%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), North Manchester has a value of 0.8% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), North Manchester has a value of 0.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): North Webster

Current Value:

Census Place (City): North Webster

0.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, North Webster has a value of 0.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), North Webster has a value of 0.2% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), North Webster has a value of 0.2% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), North Webster has a value of 0.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Ossian

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Ossian

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Ossian has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), Ossian has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Ossian has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Ossian has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Pierceton

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Pierceton

0.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Pierceton has a value of 0.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Pierceton has a value of 0.8% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Pierceton has a value of 0.8% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Pierceton has a value of 0.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Poneto

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Poneto

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Poneto has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), Poneto has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Poneto has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Poneto has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Roann

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Roann

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Roann has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Wabash, IN County Value (1.2%), Roann has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wabash, IN County Value
(1.2%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Roann has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Roann has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Roanoke

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Roanoke

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Roanoke has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Huntington, IN County Value (1.4%), Roanoke has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Huntington, IN County Value
(1.4%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Roanoke has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Roanoke has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Rome City

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Rome City

2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Rome City has a value of 2.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), Rome City has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Rome City has a value of 2.2% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Rome City has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Shipshewana

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Shipshewana

2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Shipshewana has a value of 2.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the LaGrange, IN County Value (3.6%), Shipshewana has a value of 2.9% which is lower and better.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Shipshewana has a value of 2.9% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Shipshewana has a value of 2.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Sidney

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Sidney

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Sidney has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Sidney has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Sidney has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Sidney has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Silver Lake

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Silver Lake

2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Silver Lake has a value of 2.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Silver Lake has a value of 2.0% which is higher and worse.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Silver Lake has a value of 2.0% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Silver Lake has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Somerset

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Somerset

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Somerset has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Wabash, IN County Value (1.2%), Somerset has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wabash, IN County Value
(1.2%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Somerset has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Somerset has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): South Whitley

Current Value:

Census Place (City): South Whitley

2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, South Whitley has a value of 2.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Whitley, IN County Value (1.0%), South Whitley has a value of 2.0% which is higher and worse.
Whitley, IN County Value
(1.0%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), South Whitley has a value of 2.0% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), South Whitley has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): St. Joe

Current Value:

Census Place (City): St. Joe

5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, St. Joe has a value of 5.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), St. Joe has a value of 5.5% which is higher and worse.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), St. Joe has a value of 5.5% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), St. Joe has a value of 5.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Syracuse

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Syracuse

1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Syracuse has a value of 1.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Syracuse has a value of 1.9% which is higher and worse.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Syracuse has a value of 1.9% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Syracuse has a value of 1.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Topeka

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Topeka

8.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Topeka has a value of 8.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the LaGrange, IN County Value (3.6%), Topeka has a value of 8.6% which is higher and worse.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Topeka has a value of 8.6% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Topeka has a value of 8.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Uniondale

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Uniondale

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Uniondale has a value of 1.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), Uniondale has a value of 1.1% which is higher and worse.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Uniondale has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Uniondale has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Vera Cruz

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Vera Cruz

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Vera Cruz has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), Vera Cruz has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Vera Cruz has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Vera Cruz has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Wabash

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Wabash

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Wabash has a value of 1.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Wabash, IN County Value (1.2%), Wabash has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
Wabash, IN County Value
(1.2%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Wabash has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Wabash has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Warren

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Warren

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Warren has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Huntington, IN County Value (1.4%), Warren has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Huntington, IN County Value
(1.4%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Warren has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Warren has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Warsaw

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Warsaw

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Warsaw has a value of 1.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Warsaw has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Warsaw has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Warsaw has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3% in 2016-2020)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Waterloo

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Waterloo

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Waterloo has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), Waterloo has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Waterloo has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Waterloo has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Winona Lake

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Winona Lake

0.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Winona Lake has a value of 0.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), Winona Lake has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Winona Lake has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Winona Lake has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Wolcottville

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Wolcottville

4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Wolcottville has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), Wolcottville has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Compared to the LaGrange, IN County Value (3.6%), Wolcottville has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Wolcottville has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Wolcottville has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Woodburn

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Woodburn

4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Woodburn has a value of 4.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), Woodburn has a value of 4.7% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Woodburn has a value of 4.7% which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Woodburn has a value of 4.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Census Place (City): Zanesville

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Zanesville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Zanesville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
IN Census Places
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), Zanesville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), Zanesville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Compared to the IN Value (1.7%), Zanesville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
IN Value
(1.7%)
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Zanesville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46508

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46508

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46508 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), 46508 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Over time, the 46508 value is staying the same.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46510

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46510

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46510 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), 46510 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Over time, the 46510 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46524

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46524

0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46524 has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), 46524 has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Over time, the 46524 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46538

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46538

3.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46538 has a value of 3.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), 46538 has a value of 3.0% which is higher and worse.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Over time, the 46538 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46539

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46539

0.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46539 has a value of 0.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), 46539 has a value of 0.1% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Over time, the 46539 value is staying the same.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46542

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46542

1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46542 has a value of 1.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), 46542 has a value of 1.5% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Over time, the 46542 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46555

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46555

0.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46555 has a value of 0.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), 46555 has a value of 0.1% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Over time, the 46555 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46562

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46562

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46562 has a value of 2.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), 46562 has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Over time, the 46562 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46565

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46565

1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46565 has a value of 1.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the LaGrange, IN County Value (3.6%), 46565 has a value of 1.3% which is lower and better.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Over time, the 46565 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46567

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46567

3.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46567 has a value of 3.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), 46567 has a value of 3.0% which is higher and worse.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Over time, the 46567 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46571

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46571

9.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46571 has a value of 9.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the LaGrange, IN County Value (3.6%), 46571 has a value of 9.4% which is higher and worse.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Over time, the 46571 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46580

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46580

1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46580 has a value of 1.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), 46580 has a value of 1.3% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Over time, the 46580 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46582

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46582

2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46582 has a value of 2.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), 46582 has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Over time, the 46582 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46590

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46590

0.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46590 has a value of 0.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Kosciusko, IN County Value (1.6%), 46590 has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
Kosciusko, IN County Value
(1.6%)
Over time, the 46590 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46701

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46701

2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46701 has a value of 2.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), 46701 has a value of 2.7% which is higher and worse.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Over time, the 46701 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46702

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46702

2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46702 has a value of 2.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Huntington, IN County Value (1.4%), 46702 has a value of 2.8% which is higher and worse.
Huntington, IN County Value
(1.4%)
Over time, the 46702 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46705

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46705

0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46705 has a value of 0.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), 46705 has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Over time, the 46705 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46706

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46706

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46706 has a value of 2.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), 46706 has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Over time, the 46706 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46710

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46710

3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46710 has a value of 3.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), 46710 has a value of 3.1% which is higher and worse.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Over time, the 46710 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46711

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46711

7.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46711 has a value of 7.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Adams, IN County Value (3.6%), 46711 has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
Adams, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Over time, the 46711 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46714

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46714

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46714 has a value of 0.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), 46714 has a value of 0.7% which is higher and worse.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Over time, the 46714 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46721

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46721

3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46721 has a value of 3.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), 46721 has a value of 3.8% which is higher and worse.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Over time, the 46721 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46723

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46723

0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46723 has a value of 0.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Whitley, IN County Value (1.0%), 46723 has a value of 0.4% which is lower and better.
Whitley, IN County Value
(1.0%)
Over time, the 46723 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46725

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46725

0.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46725 has a value of 0.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Whitley, IN County Value (1.0%), 46725 has a value of 0.8% which is lower and better.
Whitley, IN County Value
(1.0%)
Over time, the 46725 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46730

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46730

1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46730 has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), 46730 has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Over time, the 46730 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46731

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46731

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46731 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), 46731 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Over time, the 46731 value is staying the same.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46732

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46732

4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46732 has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), 46732 has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Over time, the 46732 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46733

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46733

0.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46733 has a value of 0.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Adams, IN County Value (3.6%), 46733 has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
Adams, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Over time, the 46733 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46738

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46738

1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46738 has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), 46738 has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Over time, the 46738 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46740

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46740

13.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46740 has a value of 13.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Adams, IN County Value (3.6%), 46740 has a value of 13.5% which is higher and worse.
Adams, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Over time, the 46740 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46741

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46741

5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46741 has a value of 5.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46741 has a value of 5.5% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46741 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46743

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46743

4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46743 has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46743 has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46743 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46745

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46745

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46745 has a value of 1.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46745 has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46745 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46746

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46746

2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46746 has a value of 2.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the LaGrange, IN County Value (3.6%), 46746 has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Over time, the 46746 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46748

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46748

0.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46748 has a value of 0.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46748 has a value of 0.2% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46748 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46750

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46750

1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46750 has a value of 1.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Huntington, IN County Value (1.4%), 46750 has a value of 1.3% which is lower and better.
Huntington, IN County Value
(1.4%)
Over time, the 46750 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46755

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46755

2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46755 has a value of 2.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), 46755 has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Over time, the 46755 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46760

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46760

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46760 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), 46760 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Over time, the 46760 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46761

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46761

3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46761 has a value of 3.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the LaGrange, IN County Value (3.6%), 46761 has a value of 3.7% which is higher and worse.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Over time, the 46761 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46763

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46763

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46763 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), 46763 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Over time, the 46763 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46764

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46764

0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46764 has a value of 0.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Whitley, IN County Value (1.0%), 46764 has a value of 0.4% which is lower and better.
Whitley, IN County Value
(1.0%)
Over time, the 46764 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46765

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46765

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46765 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46765 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46765 value is staying the same.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46766

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46766

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46766 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), 46766 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Over time, the 46766 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46767

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46767

2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46767 has a value of 2.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), 46767 has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Over time, the 46767 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46770

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46770

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46770 has a value of 0.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), 46770 has a value of 0.7% which is higher and worse.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Over time, the 46770 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46771

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46771

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46771 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the LaGrange, IN County Value (3.6%), 46771 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Over time, the 46771 value is staying the same.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46772

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46772

5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46772 has a value of 5.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Adams, IN County Value (3.6%), 46772 has a value of 5.1% which is higher and worse.
Adams, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Over time, the 46772 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46773

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46773

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46773 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46773 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46773 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46774

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46774

0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46774 has a value of 0.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46774 has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46774 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46777

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46777

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46777 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), 46777 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Over time, the 46777 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46781

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46781

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46781 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), 46781 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Over time, the 46781 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46783

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46783

0.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46783 has a value of 0.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Huntington, IN County Value (1.4%), 46783 has a value of 0.2% which is lower and better.
Huntington, IN County Value
(1.4%)
Over time, the 46783 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46784

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46784

1.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46784 has a value of 1.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), 46784 has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Over time, the 46784 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46785

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46785

1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46785 has a value of 1.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), 46785 has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Over time, the 46785 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46787

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46787

3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46787 has a value of 3.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Whitley, IN County Value (1.0%), 46787 has a value of 3.5% which is higher and worse.
Whitley, IN County Value
(1.0%)
Over time, the 46787 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46788

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46788

3.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46788 has a value of 3.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46788 has a value of 3.0% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46788 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46789

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46789

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46789 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the LaGrange, IN County Value (3.6%), 46789 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.6%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46791

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46791

0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46791 has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), 46791 has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Over time, the 46791 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46792

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46792

1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46792 has a value of 1.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Huntington, IN County Value (1.4%), 46792 has a value of 1.8% which is higher and worse.
Huntington, IN County Value
(1.4%)
Over time, the 46792 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46793

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46793

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46793 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the DeKalb, IN County Value (1.7%), 46793 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
DeKalb, IN County Value
(1.7%)
Over time, the 46793 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46794

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46794

2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46794 has a value of 2.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Noble, IN County Value (2.6%), 46794 has a value of 2.6%.
Noble, IN County Value
(2.6%)
Over time, the 46794 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46795

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46795

2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46795 has a value of 2.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the LaGrange, IN County Value (3.6%), 46795 has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
LaGrange, IN County Value
(3.6%)
Over time, the 46795 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46797

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46797

4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46797 has a value of 4.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46797 has a value of 4.4% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46797 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46798

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46798

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46798 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46798 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46798 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46799

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46799

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46799 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Wells, IN County Value (0.6%), 46799 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Wells, IN County Value
(0.6%)
Over time, the 46799 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46802

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46802

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46802 has a value of 0.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46802 has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46802 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46803

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46803

3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46803 has a value of 3.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46803 has a value of 3.6% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46803 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46804

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46804

0.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46804 has a value of 0.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46804 has a value of 0.1% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46804 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46805

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46805

3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46805 has a value of 3.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46805 has a value of 3.4% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46805 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46806

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46806

2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46806 has a value of 2.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46806 has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46806 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46807

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46807

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46807 has a value of 1.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46807 has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46807 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46808

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46808

1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46808 has a value of 1.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46808 has a value of 1.9% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46808 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46809

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46809

1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46809 has a value of 1.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46809 has a value of 1.3% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46809 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46814

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46814

3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46814 has a value of 3.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46814 has a value of 3.8% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46814 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46815

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46815

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46815 has a value of 1.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46815 has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46815 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46816

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46816

5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46816 has a value of 5.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46816 has a value of 5.9% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46816 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46818

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46818

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46818 has a value of 1.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46818 has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46818 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46819

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46819

1.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46819 has a value of 1.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46819 has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46819 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card

Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 46825

Current Value:

Zip Code: 46825

2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 46825 has a value of 2.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
IN Zip Codes
Compared to the Allen, IN County Value (1.8%), 46825 has a value of 2.5% which is higher and worse.
Allen, IN County Value
(1.8%)
Over time, the 46825 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
Learn More
Save Card