Search for Indicators
Disparities Dashboard
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
Value
Compared to:
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Allen
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Allen
55.2%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(55.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: DeKalb
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: DeKalb
44.1%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(44.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Huntington
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Huntington
52.6%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(52.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Kosciusko
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Kosciusko
42.5%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(42.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: LaGrange
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: LaGrange
23.4%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Noble
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Noble
40.3%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(40.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Wabash
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Wabash
43.2%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(43.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Wells
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Wells
43.6%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(43.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Whitley
Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19 County: Whitley
48.9%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(48.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Adams
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Adams
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Allen
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Allen
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Huntington
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Noble
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Noble
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Wabash
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Wells
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Wells
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Whitley
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Infant Mortality Rate County: Allen
Infant Mortality Rate County: Allen
7.0
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
IN Value
(7.2 in 2014-2018)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(7.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Infant Mortality Rate County: Kosciusko
Infant Mortality Rate County: Kosciusko
6.3
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
IN Value
(7.2 in 2014-2018)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(6.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide County: Allen
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide County: Allen
12.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(15.1)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Depression: Medicare Population County: Adams
Depression: Medicare Population County: Adams
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Depression: Medicare Population County: Allen
Depression: Medicare Population County: Allen
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Depression: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Depression: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Depression: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Depression: Medicare Population County: Huntington
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Depression: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Depression: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Depression: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Depression: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Depression: Medicare Population County: Noble
Depression: Medicare Population County: Noble
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Depression: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Depression: Medicare Population County: Wabash
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Depression: Medicare Population County: Wells
Depression: Medicare Population County: Wells
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Depression: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Depression: Medicare Population County: Whitley
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Mortality Data
Life Expectancy County: Allen
Life Expectancy County: Allen
76.0
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(75.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Life Expectancy County: Kosciusko
Life Expectancy County: Kosciusko
76.8
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(75.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Life Expectancy County: LaGrange
Life Expectancy County: LaGrange
78.6
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(75.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Life Expectancy County: Noble
Life Expectancy County: Noble
75.8
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(75.6)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Premature Death County: Allen
Premature Death County: Allen
9,077.2
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9,317.1)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Premature Death County: Kosciusko
Premature Death County: Kosciusko
8,368.1
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9,317.1)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Premature Death County: Noble
Premature Death County: Noble
8,824.8
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(9,317.1)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Older Adults
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Adams
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Adams
35.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Allen
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Allen
31.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: DeKalb
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: DeKalb
30.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Huntington
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Huntington
32.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Kosciusko
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Kosciusko
31.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: LaGrange
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: LaGrange
34.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Noble
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Noble
31.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Wabash
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Wabash
34.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Wells
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Wells
27.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Whitley
Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Whitley
34.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Disability Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
Adults 65+ with a Disability Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
33.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Allen, IN County Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Allen County value.
IN Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Adams
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Adams
16.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Allen
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Allen
12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: DeKalb
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: DeKalb
16.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Huntington
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Huntington
12.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Kosciusko
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Kosciusko
15.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: LaGrange
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: LaGrange
18.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Noble
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Noble
14.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Wabash
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Wabash
15.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Wells
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Wells
11.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Whitley
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Whitley
18.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
12.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Allen, IN County Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Allen County value.
IN Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Adams
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Adams
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Allen
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Allen
6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: DeKalb
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: DeKalb
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Huntington
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Huntington
5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Kosciusko
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Kosciusko
4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: LaGrange
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: LaGrange
6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Noble
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Noble
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Wabash
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Wabash
5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Wells
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Wells
4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Whitley
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Whitley
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
7.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Allen, IN County Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Allen County value.
IN Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Adams
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Adams
7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Allen
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Allen
4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: DeKalb
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: DeKalb
6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Huntington
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Huntington
5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Kosciusko
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Kosciusko
5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: LaGrange
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: LaGrange
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Noble
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Noble
5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Wabash
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Wabash
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Wells
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Wells
5.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Whitley
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Whitley
9.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Allen, IN County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Allen County value.
IN Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Adams
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Adams
12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Allen
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Allen
12.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: DeKalb
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: DeKalb
10.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Huntington
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Huntington
10.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Kosciusko
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Kosciusko
10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: LaGrange
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: LaGrange
10.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Noble
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Noble
12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Wabash
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Wabash
9.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Wells
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Wells
8.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Whitley
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Whitley
10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty Census Place (City): Fort Wayne
13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Allen, IN County Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Allen County value.
IN Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease County: Allen
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease County: Allen
37.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(33.1)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(31.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease County: Kosciusko
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease County: Kosciusko
27.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(33.1)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(31.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(26.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Adams
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Adams
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Allen
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Allen
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Huntington
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
3.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Noble
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Noble
3.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Wabash
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Wells
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Wells
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Whitley
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Other Conditions
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease County: Allen
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease County: Allen
16.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,416 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(17.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(12.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease County: Kosciusko
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease County: Kosciusko
18.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,416 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(17.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(12.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Adams
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Adams
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Allen
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Allen
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Huntington
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Noble
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Noble
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Wabash
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Wells
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Wells
27.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Whitley
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Adams
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Adams
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Allen
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Allen
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Huntington
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Noble
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Noble
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Wabash
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Wells
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Wells
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Whitley
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Other Conditions
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Adams
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Adams
34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Allen
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Allen
36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: DeKalb
36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Huntington
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Huntington
36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Kosciusko
34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: LaGrange
32.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Noble
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Noble
36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Wabash
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Wabash
37.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Wells
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Wells
36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Whitley
Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Whitley
36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Physical Activity
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Adams
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Adams
18.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(21.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Allen
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Allen
20.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(22.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: DeKalb
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: DeKalb
22.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(18.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Huntington
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Huntington
16.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(19.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Kosciusko
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Kosciusko
22.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(22.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: LaGrange
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: LaGrange
19.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Noble
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Noble
17.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(22.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Wabash
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Wabash
21.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Wells
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Wells
21.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(19.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Whitley
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Whitley
22.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Prevention & Safety
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms County: Allen
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms County: Allen
14.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(14.8)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
Health / Prevention & Safety
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
Value
Compared to:
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Adams
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Adams
55.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(59.4)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(56.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
